CKANs are measurably less efficient than standard CNNs, and on ImageNet the accuracy gap is large, but the paper's baseline and timing comparisons are not controlled.
A Benchmarking Study of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks on Tabular Data
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have very recently been introduced into the world of machine learning, quickly capturing the attention of the entire community. However, KANs have mostly been tested for approximating complex functions or processing synthetic data, while a test on real-world tabular datasets is currently lacking. In this paper, we present a benchmarking study comparing KANs and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) on tabular datasets. The study evaluates task performance and training times. From the results obtained on the various datasets, KANs demonstrate superior or comparable accuracy and F1 scores, excelling particularly in datasets with numerous instances, suggesting robust handling of complex data. We also highlight that this performance improvement of KANs comes with a higher computational cost when compared to MLPs of comparable sizes.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Efficiency Bottlenecks of Convolutional Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Comprehensive Scrutiny with ImageNet, AlexNet, LeNet and Tabular Classification
CKANs are measurably less efficient than standard CNNs, and on ImageNet the accuracy gap is large, but the paper's baseline and timing comparisons are not controlled.