Critical Inker scaffolds critical reflection during AI-assisted writing via Socratic questioning and visual logical-error feedback, reporting 91.2% argument overlap with ground truth and 87% validity accuracy in a pilot evaluation.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
LLMs generate lower-quality STEM explanations for marginalized student profiles in Indian and American contexts, with intersectional compounding producing gaps of up to 2.55 grade levels.
citing papers explorer
-
Critical Inker: Scaffolding Critical Thinking in AI-Assisted Writing Through Socratic Questioning
Critical Inker scaffolds critical reflection during AI-assisted writing via Socratic questioning and visual logical-error feedback, reporting 91.2% argument overlap with ground truth and 87% validity accuracy in a pilot evaluation.
-
Compounding Disadvantage: Auditing Intersectional Bias in LLM-Generated Explanations Across Indian and American STEM Education
LLMs generate lower-quality STEM explanations for marginalized student profiles in Indian and American contexts, with intersectional compounding producing gaps of up to 2.55 grade levels.