SafeSteer restricts reverse KL penalty to safety tokens selected via activation steering, achieving strong safety on seven benchmarks with minimal degradation on five capability benchmarks using only 100 harmful samples and no general data.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07445 , year=
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often require fine-tuning (FT) to perform well on downstream tasks, but FT can induce safety-alignment drift even when the training dataset contains only benign data. Prior work shows that introducing a small fraction of harmful data can substantially compromise LLM refusal behavior, causing LLMs to comply with harmful requests. Existing defense methods often rely on model-wide interventions, such as restricting which parameters are updated or injecting additional safety data, which can limit generality and degrade downstream task performance. To address these limitations, we propose a fine-tuning framework called Preserving Safety Alignment via Constrained Tokens (PACT), which stabilizes the model's confidence on safety tokens. Our approach is motivated by the empirical observation that safety-aligned behavior is reflected in the model's token-level output confidence and is often concentrated on a small subset of safety-related tokens. During downstream fine-tuning, we regularize the fine-tuned model to match the aligned reference model's confidence on safety-related tokens at each response step, while leaving non-safety tokens largely unconstrained to allow effective task adaptation. This targeted constraint prevents alignment drift without imposing global restrictions that typically trade off with model utility. Our code is available at {https://github.com/Glresearch1/PACT}.
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
MSD enables cross-lingual safety transfer in LLMs via self-distillation with Dual-Perspective Safety Weighting, improving safety in low-resource languages without target response data.
Empirical comparison of alignment ablation methods on a 60-prompt security evaluation suite shows task-only LoRA achieves 0.87 mean security score with 0.13 unsafe compliance.
citing papers explorer
-
SafeSteer: Localized On-Policy Distillation for Efficient Safety Alignment
SafeSteer restricts reverse KL penalty to safety tokens selected via activation steering, achieving strong safety on seven benchmarks with minimal degradation on five capability benchmarks using only 100 harmful samples and no general data.
-
Multilingual Safety Alignment via Self-Distillation
MSD enables cross-lingual safety transfer in LLMs via self-distillation with Dual-Perspective Safety Weighting, improving safety in low-resource languages without target response data.
-
Ablating Safety: Mechanisms for Removing Alignment in Language Models for Security Applications
Empirical comparison of alignment ablation methods on a 60-prompt security evaluation suite shows task-only LoRA achieves 0.87 mean security score with 0.13 unsafe compliance.