Pith. sign in

Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

AI systems increasingly shape critical decisions across personal and societal domains. While empirical risk minimization (ERM) drives much of the AI success, it typically prioritizes accuracy over trustworthiness, often resulting in biases, opacity, and other adverse effects. This paper discusses how key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of ERM. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CY 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation

cs.CY · 2025-05-27 · conditional · novelty 4.0

AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation cs.CY · 2025-05-27 · conditional · none · ref 76 · internal anchor

    AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.