AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.
Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
AI systems increasingly shape critical decisions across personal and societal domains. While empirical risk minimization (ERM) drives much of the AI success, it typically prioritizes accuracy over trustworthiness, often resulting in biases, opacity, and other adverse effects. This paper discusses how key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of ERM. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation
AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.