A computational argumentation framework evaluates LLM summaries of parliamentary debates by checking preservation of formal argument structures tied to contested proposals.
van Engers and Enrico Francesconi and Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sileno and Frank Schilder and Adam Wyner and Trevor J
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating LLM-Driven Summarisation of Parliamentary Debates with Computational Argumentation
A computational argumentation framework evaluates LLM summaries of parliamentary debates by checking preservation of formal argument structures tied to contested proposals.