On four spacecraft guidance problems, reinforcement learning trains networks that are more robust to disturbances than behavioural cloning, but behavioural cloning matches optimal control when the expert data is accurate.
Frequency and Generalisation of Periodic Activation Functions in Reinforcement Learning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Periodic activation functions, often referred to as learned Fourier features have been widely demonstrated to improve sample efficiency and stability in a variety of deep RL algorithms. Potentially incompatible hypotheses have been made about the source of these improvements. One is that periodic activations learn low frequency representations and as a result avoid overfitting to bootstrapped targets. Another is that periodic activations learn high frequency representations that are more expressive, allowing networks to quickly fit complex value functions. We analyse these claims empirically, finding that periodic representations consistently converge to high frequencies regardless of their initialisation frequency. We also find that while periodic activation functions improve sample efficiency, they exhibit worse generalization on states with added observation noise -- especially when compared to otherwise equivalent networks with ReLU activation functions. Finally, we show that weight decay regularization is able to partially offset the overfitting of periodic activation functions, delivering value functions that learn quickly while also generalizing.
fields
eess.SY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Comparing Behavioural Cloning and Reinforcement Learning for Spacecraft Guidance and Control Networks
On four spacecraft guidance problems, reinforcement learning trains networks that are more robust to disturbances than behavioural cloning, but behavioural cloning matches optimal control when the expert data is accurate.