A new dataset of 55 general-purpose claim-rebuttal pairs, annotated across 50 debate motions and 200 speeches, shows that generic rebuttals are often plausible and that claim-frequency priors outperform text-based baselines.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal
A new dataset of 55 general-purpose claim-rebuttal pairs, annotated across 50 debate motions and 200 speeches, shows that generic rebuttals are often plausible and that claim-frequency priors outperform text-based baselines.