Survey evidence shows VR privacy deception exploits cognitive and ergonomic vulnerabilities, increasing acceptance of invasive data practices framed as immersion-preserving and fostering privacy resignation.
InProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA)(CHI ’20)
8 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
8
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
ConsentDiff enables longitudinal tracking of privacy policy churn and consent UI patterns, finding ongoing changes, shifts away from high-friction banners, and higher policy-UI alignment when rejection options are visible.
PrivacyMotiv generates LLM-created speculative personas and traceable journey stories to raise UX designers' empathy and motivation for privacy, yielding 59% more privacy issues found and 70% more redesign ideas in a study of 16 professionals.
A Privacy Guardian Agent automates routine consent choices with user profiles and contextual awareness, escalating unclear or high-risk cases to users while keeping autonomous decisions reviewable for transparency.
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.
Generative interfaces let LLMs create task-specific UIs that users prefer up to 72% more than standard chat responses across tested tasks.
WCAG guidelines flag three deceptive patterns—countdown timers, auto-play, and hidden information—as violations, providing a legal and design route to limit manipulative interfaces.
A systematic review of user experiments finds that dark patterns reliably alter behavior with large variance in effect sizes, most interventions fail to mitigate them, and effects are similar across tested demographic groups.
citing papers explorer
-
Rushed by Discomfort, Trapped by Immersion: Users' Experiences and Responses to Privacy Deceptive Design in Commercial VR Applications
Survey evidence shows VR privacy deception exploits cognitive and ergonomic vulnerabilities, increasing acceptance of invasive data practices framed as immersion-preserving and fostering privacy resignation.
-
ConsentDiff at Scale: Longitudinal Audits of Web Privacy Policy Changes and UI Frictions
ConsentDiff enables longitudinal tracking of privacy policy churn and consent UI patterns, finding ongoing changes, shifts away from high-friction banners, and higher policy-UI alignment when rejection options are visible.
-
PrivacyMotiv: Speculative Persona Journeys for Empathic and Motivating Privacy Reviews in UX Design
PrivacyMotiv generates LLM-created speculative personas and traceable journey stories to raise UX designers' empathy and motivation for privacy, yielding 59% more privacy issues found and 70% more redesign ideas in a study of 16 professionals.
-
The Privacy Guardian Agent: Towards Trustworthy AI Privacy Agents
A Privacy Guardian Agent automates routine consent choices with user profiles and contextual awareness, escalating unclear or high-risk cases to users while keeping autonomous decisions reviewable for transparency.
-
The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.
-
Generative Interfaces for Language Models
Generative interfaces let LLMs create task-specific UIs that users prefer up to 72% more than standard chat responses across tested tasks.
-
Access Over Deception: Fighting Deceptive Patterns through Accessibility
WCAG guidelines flag three deceptive patterns—countdown timers, auto-play, and hidden information—as violations, providing a legal and design route to limit manipulative interfaces.
-
A Systematic Review of User Experiments Measuring the Effects of Dark Patterns
A systematic review of user experiments finds that dark patterns reliably alter behavior with large variance in effect sizes, most interventions fail to mitigate them, and effects are similar across tested demographic groups.