Across three VLA models and four simulated manipulation tasks, motion-instability and goal-distance metrics correlate with expert-rated execution quality, showing that binary success rates hide large quality differences.
Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine visual and textual data for tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Proper uncertainty calibration is crucial, yet challenging, for reliable use in areas like healthcare and autonomous driving. This paper investigates representative MLLMs, focusing on their calibration across various scenarios, including before and after visual fine-tuning, as well as before and after multimodal training of the base LLMs. We observed miscalibration in their performance, and at the same time, no significant differences in calibration across these scenarios. We also highlight how uncertainty differs between text and images and how their integration affects overall uncertainty. To better understand MLLMs' miscalibration and their ability to self-assess uncertainty, we construct the IDK (I don't know) dataset, which is key to evaluating how they handle unknowns. Our findings reveal that MLLMs tend to give answers rather than admit uncertainty, but this self-assessment improves with proper prompt adjustments. Finally, to calibrate MLLMs and enhance model reliability, we propose techniques such as temperature scaling and iterative prompt optimization. Our results provide insights into improving MLLMs for effective and responsible deployment in multimodal applications. Code and IDK dataset: https://github.com/hfutml/Calibration-MLLM.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating Uncertainty and Quality of Visual Language Action-enabled Robots
Across three VLA models and four simulated manipulation tasks, motion-instability and goal-distance metrics correlate with expert-rated execution quality, showing that binary success rates hide large quality differences.