A meta-analysis of 28 studies finds no average creativity gap between GenAI and humans, a small boost when humans collaborate with GenAI, and a large drop in idea diversity in those collaborations.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 12 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
12
external citations · OpenAlex
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Generative AI and Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
A meta-analysis of 28 studies finds no average creativity gap between GenAI and humans, a small boost when humans collaborate with GenAI, and a large drop in idea diversity in those collaborations.