LLMs exhibit a persistent modality gap versus specialized audio encoders on MSEB tasks, with no conclusive evidence favoring audio-native over cascaded architectures.
Benchmarking LLMs on the Massive Sound Embedding Benchmark (MSEB)
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The Massive Sound Embedding Benchmark (MSEB) has emerged as a standard for evaluating the functional breadth of audio models. While initial baselines focused on specialized encoders, the shift toward "audio-native" Large Language Models (LLMs) suggests a new paradigm where a single multimodal backbone may replace complex, task-specific pipelines. This paper provides a rigorous empirical evaluation of leading LLMs - including members from the Gemini and GPT families - across the eight core MSEB capabilities to assess their efficacy and audio-text parity. Our results indicate that while a significant modality gap persists regarding performance and robustness, the empirical evidence for an "optimal" modeling approach remains inconclusive. Ultimately, the choice between audionative and cascaded architectures depends heavily on specific use-case requirements and the underlying assumptions regarding latency, cost, and reasoning depth.
fields
cs.SD 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Benchmarking LLMs on the Massive Sound Embedding Benchmark (MSEB)
LLMs exhibit a persistent modality gap versus specialized audio encoders on MSEB tasks, with no conclusive evidence favoring audio-native over cascaded architectures.