Scoring the same cervical-spine segmentations against silver rather than expert labels overestimates Dice by ~8 points and turns a non-significant age fairness gap into a significant one via variance collapse.
Official Journal of the European Union, L series, 12 July 2024 (2024)
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
eess.IV 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
False Confidence: Automated Labels Confound Fairness Audits in Cervical Spine Segmentation
Scoring the same cervical-spine segmentations against silver rather than expert labels overestimates Dice by ~8 points and turns a non-significant age fairness gap into a significant one via variance collapse.