REINFORCE-style variants outperform PPO, DPO, and RAFT in RLHF for LLMs by removing unnecessary PPO components and adapting the simpler method to LLM alignment characteristics.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
Pre-training loss predicts LLM math reasoning better than parameter count; rejection sampling fine-tuning with diverse paths raises LLaMA-7B accuracy on GSM8K from 35.9% with SFT to 49.3%.
citing papers explorer
-
Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
REINFORCE-style variants outperform PPO, DPO, and RAFT in RLHF for LLMs by removing unnecessary PPO components and adapting the simpler method to LLM alignment characteristics.
-
Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models
Pre-training loss predicts LLM math reasoning better than parameter count; rejection sampling fine-tuning with diverse paths raises LLaMA-7B accuracy on GSM8K from 35.9% with SFT to 49.3%.