A scoping review of 557 studies finds medical agentic AI is technically promising but overwhelmingly validated on benchmarks, simulations, and retrospective data rather than in real clinical workflows.
hub
InProceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 10183–10213 (2025)
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 1,002 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
1,002
external citations · OpenAlex
hub tools
fields
cs.CV 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Agentic AI in medicine: architectures, applications, evaluation, and challenges for clinical translation
A scoping review of 557 studies finds medical agentic AI is technically promising but overwhelmingly validated on benchmarks, simulations, and retrospective data rather than in real clinical workflows.