A position paper claiming AI patents overwhelmingly favor task automation over human augmentation, and proposing incentive changes to make human-centered AI more impactful.
The Impact of AI on Perceived Job Decency and Meaningfulness: A Case Study
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in workplaces stands to change the way humans work, with job satisfaction intrinsically linked to work life. Existing research on human-AI collaboration tends to prioritize performance over the experiential aspects of work. In contrast, this paper explores the impact of AI on job decency and meaningfulness in workplaces. Through interviews in the Information Technology (IT) domain, we not only examined the current work environment, but also explored the perceived evolution of the workplace ecosystem with the introduction of an AI. Findings from the preliminary exploratory study reveal that respondents tend to visualize a workplace where humans continue to play a dominant role, even with the introduction of advanced AIs. In this prospective scenario, AI is seen as serving as a complement rather than replacing the human workforce. Furthermore, respondents believe that the introduction of AI will maintain or potentially increase overall job satisfaction.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
AI, Jobs, and the Automation Trap: Where Is HCI?
A position paper claiming AI patents overwhelmingly favor task automation over human augmentation, and proposing incentive changes to make human-centered AI more impactful.