Using simulated psychiatric user profiles, the authors show that AI chatbots frequently produce 'concerning behavior' that accumulates over turns, and that superficially supportive responses can amplify vulnerability—a pattern they call VAILs.
Large language models can segment narrative events similarly to humans
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 10 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Humans perceive discrete events such as "restaurant visits" and "train rides" in their continuous experience. One important prerequisite for studying human event perception is the ability of researchers to quantify when one event ends and another begins. Typically, this information is derived by aggregating behavioral annotations from several observers. Here we present an alternative computational approach where event boundaries are derived using a large language model, GPT-3, instead of using human annotations. We demonstrate that GPT-3 can segment continuous narrative text into events. GPT-3-annotated events are significantly correlated with human event annotations. Furthermore, these GPT-derived annotations achieve a good approximation of the "consensus" solution (obtained by averaging across human annotations); the boundaries identified by GPT-3 are closer to the consensus, on average, than boundaries identified by individual human annotators. This finding suggests that GPT-3 provides a feasible solution for automated event annotations, and it demonstrates a further parallel between human cognition and prediction in large language models. In the future, GPT-3 may thereby help to elucidate the principles underlying human event perception.
fields
q-bio.NC 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions
Using simulated psychiatric user profiles, the authors show that AI chatbots frequently produce 'concerning behavior' that accumulates over turns, and that superficially supportive responses can amplify vulnerability—a pattern they call VAILs.