A statistical framework decomposes human annotation outcomes into four interpretable variation sources and extends classical measurement-error models to handle both shared and individualized notions of truth.
Cheap and fast–but is it good? evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
stat.ME 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labeling
A statistical framework decomposes human annotation outcomes into four interpretable variation sources and extends classical measurement-error models to handle both shared and individualized notions of truth.