METIS internalizes curriculum judgment in LLM reinforcement fine-tuning by predicting within-prompt reward variance via in-context learning and jointly optimizing with a self-judgment reward, yielding superior performance and up to 67% faster convergence across math, code, and agent benchmarks.
Liu, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan
6 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 2 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
dataset 1polarities
use dataset 1representative citing papers
MedVIGIL provides a 300-case evaluation suite with 2556 probes that measures silent failures in medical VLMs under broken evidence, showing the best model at 69.2 on the composite score versus a human radiologist at 83.3.
Average token log-probability provides a zero-shot confidence signal for small LLMs that matches supervised baselines in-distribution and outperforms them out-of-distribution, with a new retrieval-conditional variant improving further at lower latency.
JTS trains reasoning models via supervised warm-up and missing-premise RL to make an explicit answerability commitment that triggers early termination on unanswerable inputs, raising Abstention@Detection near saturation.
Supervised fine-tuning degrades the correlation between confidence scores and output quality in language models, driven by factors like training distribution similarity rather than true quality.
Negative log-likelihood of the greedy-decoded most likely sequence (G-NLL) is a principled single-sequence uncertainty measure for LLMs that achieves state-of-the-art results.
citing papers explorer
-
Internalizing Curriculum Judgment for LLM Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
METIS internalizes curriculum judgment in LLM reinforcement fine-tuning by predicting within-prompt reward variance via in-context learning and jointly optimizing with a self-judgment reward, yielding superior performance and up to 67% faster convergence across math, code, and agent benchmarks.
-
MedVIGIL: Evaluating Trustworthy Medical VLMs Under Broken Visual Evidence
MedVIGIL provides a 300-case evaluation suite with 2556 probes that measures silent failures in medical VLMs under broken evidence, showing the best model at 69.2 on the composite score versus a human radiologist at 83.3.
-
Zero-Shot Confidence Estimation for Small LLMs: When Supervised Baselines Aren't Worth Training
Average token log-probability provides a zero-shot confidence signal for small LLMs that matches supervised baselines in-distribution and outperforms them out-of-distribution, with a new retrieval-conditional variant improving further at lower latency.
-
Bridging the Detection-to-Abstention Gap in Reasoning Models under Insufficient Information
JTS trains reasoning models via supervised warm-up and missing-premise RL to make an explicit answerability commitment that triggers early termination on unanswerable inputs, raising Abstention@Detection near saturation.
-
Confident in a Confidence Score: Investigating the Sensitivity of Confidence Scores to Supervised Fine-Tuning
Supervised fine-tuning degrades the correlation between confidence scores and output quality in language models, driven by factors like training distribution similarity rather than true quality.
-
Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence Measure
Negative log-likelihood of the greedy-decoded most likely sequence (G-NLL) is a principled single-sequence uncertainty measure for LLMs that achieves state-of-the-art results.