Meta-analysis of 162 studies shows reduced prosocial behavior and moral engagement with agents versus humans, but comparable trust and performance, with agents perceived as less competent and likeable.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
Atomic fact-checking of LLM oncology recommendations increased clinician trust from 26.9% to 66.5% (Cohen's d=0.94) in a trial of 356 doctors.
citing papers explorer
-
Psychological and behavioural responses in human-agent vs. human-human interactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis of 162 studies shows reduced prosocial behavior and moral engagement with agents versus humans, but comparable trust and performance, with agents perceived as less competent and likeable.
-
Atomic Fact-Checking Increases Clinician Trust in Large Language Model Recommendations for Oncology Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Atomic fact-checking of LLM oncology recommendations increased clinician trust from 26.9% to 66.5% (Cohen's d=0.94) in a trial of 356 doctors.