The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow because persistent surface currents follow from observed angular momentum quantization rather than Lorentz force on radial charges.
The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The Meissner effect is the expulsion of magnetic flux from the interior of a bulk superconductor in the presence of the constant critical magnetic field by the persistent current circulating near the surface of the superconductor. The conventional theory of superconductivity explains the appearance of the persistent current in the Meissner effect and other macroscopic quantum phenomena observed in superconductors as a consequence of the quantization of angular momentum of Cooper pairs. According to the alternative theory of hole superconductivity the persistent current appears due to the Lorentz force acting on a radial charge flow rather than due to quantization. Therefore, the author of this theory, Jorge Hirsch, argues in his numerous publications that a radial charge flow is required to explain the Meissner effect. This article draws attention to the fact that the appearance of the persistent current because of quantization is not only the statement of the conventional theory of superconductivity, but first of all the experimental fact that cannot be explained using the Lorentz force. Therefore, the explanation of the Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cond-mat.supr-con 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
contest 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow
The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow because persistent surface currents follow from observed angular momentum quantization rather than Lorentz force on radial charges.