Empirical flow matching introduces coupled biases from plug-in estimation, including altered statistical targets, non-gradient minimizers, and non-unique dynamics via flux-null fields, with base distribution controlling kinetic energy tails.
Title resolution pending
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Flow matching models follow a two-stage process of navigation across data modes then refinement to nearest samples, revealed by exact computation of the oracle marginal velocity field.
SiLD is a score-matching framework that learns both manifold projection and intrinsic density from a single objective, with proven sample complexity depending only on intrinsic dimension.
Diffusion models overfit denoising loss at intermediate noise but generalize in inference as model error smooths the flow field and sampling paths avoid memorized noisy training data.
Flow matching generative models preserve sample quality, diversity, and latent representations despite pruning 50% of the CelebA-HQ dataset or altering architecture and training configurations.
citing papers explorer
-
On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers
Empirical flow matching introduces coupled biases from plug-in estimation, including altered statistical targets, non-gradient minimizers, and non-unique dynamics via flux-null fields, with base distribution controlling kinetic energy tails.
-
From Navigation to Refinement: Revealing the Two-Stage Nature of Flow-based Diffusion Models through Oracle Velocity
Flow matching models follow a two-stage process of navigation across data modes then refinement to nearest samples, revealed by exact computation of the oracle marginal velocity field.
-
Provably Learning Diffusion Models under the Manifold Hypothesis: Collapse and Refine
SiLD is a score-matching framework that learns both manifold projection and intrinsic density from a single objective, with proven sample complexity depending only on intrinsic dimension.
-
Diffusion Models Memorize in Training -- and Generalize in Inference
Diffusion models overfit denoising loss at intermediate noise but generalize in inference as model error smooths the flow field and sampling paths avoid memorized noisy training data.
-
The Amazing Stability of Flow Matching
Flow matching generative models preserve sample quality, diversity, and latent representations despite pruning 50% of the CelebA-HQ dataset or altering architecture and training configurations.
- Follow the Mean: Reference-Guided Flow Matching
- Exploring and Exploiting Stability in Latent Flow Matching