Danish Dynaword packages 4.8B tokens of openly licensed Danish text into a continuously versioned, test-gated corpus that improves language-model perplexity compared with Danish Gigaword.
Corpora Compared: The Case of the Swedish Gigaword & Wikipedia Corpora
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this work, we show that the difference in performance of embeddings from differently sourced data for a given language can be due to other factors besides data size. Natural language processing (NLP) tasks usually perform better with embeddings from bigger corpora. However, broadness of covered domain and noise can play important roles. We evaluate embeddings based on two Swedish corpora: The Gigaword and Wikipedia, in analogy (intrinsic) tests and discover that the embeddings from the Wikipedia corpus generally outperform those from the Gigaword corpus, which is a bigger corpus. Downstream tests will be required to have a definite evaluation.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Dynaword: From One-shot to Continuously Developed Datasets
Danish Dynaword packages 4.8B tokens of openly licensed Danish text into a continuously versioned, test-gated corpus that improves language-model perplexity compared with Danish Gigaword.