Sentence-embedding retrieval ranks the correct AI Incident in the top three for about 98% of test reports when titles and descriptions are combined, but possible train/test leakage likely inflates that number.
In Defense of Cross-Encoders for Zero-Shot Retrieval
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 6 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Bi-encoders and cross-encoders are widely used in many state-of-the-art retrieval pipelines. In this work we study the generalization ability of these two types of architectures on a wide range of parameter count on both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios. We find that the number of parameters and early query-document interactions of cross-encoders play a significant role in the generalization ability of retrieval models. Our experiments show that increasing model size results in marginal gains on in-domain test sets, but much larger gains in new domains never seen during fine-tuning. Furthermore, we show that cross-encoders largely outperform bi-encoders of similar size in several tasks. In the BEIR benchmark, our largest cross-encoder surpasses a state-of-the-art bi-encoder by more than 4 average points. Finally, we show that using bi-encoders as first-stage retrievers provides no gains in comparison to a simpler retriever such as BM25 on out-of-domain tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/guilhermemr04/scaling-zero-shot-retrieval.git
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Automating AI Failure Tracking: Semantic Association of Reports in AI Incident Database
Sentence-embedding retrieval ranks the correct AI Incident in the top three for about 98% of test reports when titles and descriptions are combined, but possible train/test leakage likely inflates that number.