A position paper documenting inconsistent and often implicit definitions of 'hypothesis' across NLP hypothesis mining tasks and calling for standardization.
e-SNLI-VE: Corrected Visual-Textual Entailment with Natural Language Explanations
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
The recently proposed SNLI-VE corpus for recognising visual-textual entailment is a large, real-world dataset for fine-grained multimodal reasoning. However, the automatic way in which SNLI-VE has been assembled (via combining parts of two related datasets) gives rise to a large number of errors in the labels of this corpus. In this paper, we first present a data collection effort to correct the class with the highest error rate in SNLI-VE. Secondly, we re-evaluate an existing model on the corrected corpus, which we call SNLI-VE-2.0, and provide a quantitative comparison with its performance on the non-corrected corpus. Thirdly, we introduce e-SNLI-VE, which appends human-written natural language explanations to SNLI-VE-2.0. Finally, we train models that learn from these explanations at training time, and output such explanations at testing time.
citation-role summary
dataset 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
dataset 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
What Are Research Hypotheses?
A position paper documenting inconsistent and often implicit definitions of 'hypothesis' across NLP hypothesis mining tasks and calling for standardization.