Adapting tabular foundation models with an MTLR survival head produces competitive or superior C-index scores on MIMIC-IV (0.856) and eICU (0.797) compared to DeepSurv and zero-shot baselines.
Retrieval-aligned Tabular Foundation Models Enable Robust Clinical Risk Prediction in Electronic Health Records Under Real-world Constraints
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Clinical prediction from structured electronic health records (EHRs) is challenging due to high dimensionality, heterogeneity, class imbalance, and distribution shift. While tabular in-context learning (TICL) and retrieval-augmented methods perform well on generic benchmarks, their behavior in clinical settings remains unclear. We present a multi-cohort EHR benchmark comparing classical, deep tabular, and TICL models across varying data scale, feature dimensionality, outcome rarity, and cross-cohort generalization. PFN-based TICL models are sample-efficient in low-data regimes but degrade under naive distance-based retrieval as heterogeneity and imbalance increase. We propose AWARE, a task-aligned retrieval framework using supervised embedding learning and lightweight adapters. AWARE improves AUPRC by up to 12.2% under extreme imbalance, with gains increasing with data complexity. Our results identify retrieval quality and retrieval-inference alignment as key bottlenecks for deploying tabular in-context learning in clinical prediction.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Tabular Foundation Models for Clinical Survival Analysis via Survival-Aware Adaptation
Adapting tabular foundation models with an MTLR survival head produces competitive or superior C-index scores on MIMIC-IV (0.856) and eICU (0.797) compared to DeepSurv and zero-shot baselines.