Quantum algorithms for Gaussian process regression lose their exponential speedup because kernel matrix condition numbers grow at least linearly with dataset size.
Quantum principal component analysis only achieves an exponential speedup because of its state preparation assumptions
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
A central roadblock to analyzing quantum algorithms on quantum states is the lack of a comparable input model for classical algorithms. Inspired by recent work of the author [E. Tang, STOC'19], we introduce such a model, where we assume we can efficiently perform $\ell^2$-norm samples of input data, a natural analogue to quantum algorithms that assume efficient state preparation of classical data. Though this model produces less practical algorithms than the (stronger) standard model of classical computation, it captures versions of many of the features and nuances of quantum linear algebra algorithms. With this model, we describe classical analogues to Lloyd, Mohseni, and Rebentrost's quantum algorithms for principal component analysis [Nat. Phys. 10, 631 (2014)] and nearest-centroid clustering [arXiv:1307.0411]. Since they are only polynomially slower, these algorithms suggest that the exponential speedups of their quantum counterparts are simply an artifact of state preparation assumptions.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Assessing Quantum Advantage for Gaussian Process Regression
Quantum algorithms for Gaussian process regression lose their exponential speedup because kernel matrix condition numbers grow at least linearly with dataset size.