LLMs generated 615 vulnerable code snippets aligned with CAPEC and CWE frameworks across three languages, with 0.98 cosine similarity between model outputs.
Can large language models find and fix vulnerable software?
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
Empirical evaluation shows that code generated by all seven tested LLMs contains vulnerabilities, the majority of critical or high severity.
Survey mapping LLM applications in software quality assurance to established standards including ISO/IEC 12207, ISO 25010, CMMI, and TMM, with case studies, challenges, and future directions.
citing papers explorer
-
From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks
LLMs generated 615 vulnerable code snippets aligned with CAPEC and CWE frameworks across three languages, with 0.98 cosine similarity between model outputs.
-
Security of LLM-generated Code: A Comparative Analysis
Empirical evaluation shows that code generated by all seven tested LLMs contains vulnerabilities, the majority of critical or high severity.
-
A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standards
Survey mapping LLM applications in software quality assurance to established standards including ISO/IEC 12207, ISO 25010, CMMI, and TMM, with case studies, challenges, and future directions.