pith. sign in

Attention is all you need

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

fields

cs.LG 2 cs.CL 1

years

2026 1 2024 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 3

representative citing papers

Massive Activations in Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-02-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Massive activations are constant large values in LLMs that function as indispensable bias terms and concentrate attention probabilities on specific tokens.

Priming: Hybrid State Space Models From Pre-trained Transformers

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Priming transfers knowledge from pre-trained Transformers to hybrid SSM-attention models, recovering performance with minimal additional tokens and showing Gated KalmaNet outperforming Mamba-2 on long-context reasoning at 32B scale.

EventFlow: Forecasting Temporal Point Processes with Flow Matching

cs.LG · 2024-10-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

EventFlow applies flow matching to learn joint distributions over event times for temporal point processes, reporting 20-53% lower forecast error than autoregressive baselines on standard TPP benchmarks with fewer sampling calls.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • Massive Activations in Large Language Models cs.CL · 2024-02-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 86

    Massive activations are constant large values in LLMs that function as indispensable bias terms and concentrate attention probabilities on specific tokens.

  • Priming: Hybrid State Space Models From Pre-trained Transformers cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · none · ref 85

    Priming transfers knowledge from pre-trained Transformers to hybrid SSM-attention models, recovering performance with minimal additional tokens and showing Gated KalmaNet outperforming Mamba-2 on long-context reasoning at 32B scale.

  • EventFlow: Forecasting Temporal Point Processes with Flow Matching cs.LG · 2024-10-09 · unverdicted · none · ref 38

    EventFlow applies flow matching to learn joint distributions over event times for temporal point processes, reporting 20-53% lower forecast error than autoregressive baselines on standard TPP benchmarks with fewer sampling calls.