Pith. sign in

The unified cross-disciplinary model of the operation of neurons

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Physics perfectly describes neuronal operation, provided that we take into account that biology uses slow, positively charged ions rather than electrons as charge carriers and remove untested ad hoc hypotheses that contradict science's first principles. We also incorporate recent experimental discoveries into the outdated classic theoretical description. Lipid mechanisms are really very important for cellular biology, but they are certainly not suitable for describing the phenomena we discuss. We introduce the correct physical model, significantly enhancing the classic \gls{HH} model; furthermore, the fundamentally bio-electrically triggered operation leads to changes in the electrical, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties of living matter. We derive the resting potential from first principles of science, showing that it is unrelated to an ad hoc linear combination of mobilities or reversal potentials, as the \gls{GHK} equation claims. Furthermore, we derive an "equivalent thermodynamic electric field" that enables discussion of, among others, the operation of ion channels, their ion selectivity, and voltage sensing. We demonstrate that a simple electrical-thermodynamic control circuit regulates neuronal operation, setting and maintaining a stable resting potential and handling an unstable transient process known as the \gls{AP}. Its setpoint entirely defines the resting potential, explaining its robustness during growth and evolution. Our cross-disciplinary approach naturally fuses the electrical and mechanical/thermodynamic description of neuronal operation, resolves the decades-old mystery of "heat absorption" and "leakage current" (with their far-reaching consequences), and derives the thermodynamic description of neural computing. We defy that science cannot describe life.

years

2026 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

representative citing papers

Is K+ current in Action Potential real?

physics.bio-ph · 2026-08-01 · reject · novelty 5.0

The paper claims the delayed K+ current of the Hodgkin–Huxley model is a voltage-clamp artifact; native repolarization is a capacitive discharge through the axon initial segment combined with elastic membrane oscillation.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Is K+ current in Action Potential real? physics.bio-ph · 2026-08-01 · reject · none · ref 6 · internal anchor

    The paper claims the delayed K+ current of the Hodgkin–Huxley model is a voltage-clamp artifact; native repolarization is a capacitive discharge through the axon initial segment combined with elastic membrane oscillation.