A systematic review of Action Quality Assessment organizes the past decade of research into 7 trends, 9 dataset domains, and performance comparisons across 195 papers.
ExeChecker: Where Did I Go Wrong?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this paper, we present a contrastive learning based framework, ExeChecker, for the interpretation of rehabilitation exercises. Our work builds upon state-of-the-art advances in the area of human pose estimation, graph-attention neural networks, and transformer interpretablity. The downstream task is to assist rehabilitation by providing informative feedback to users while they are performing prescribed exercises. We utilize a contrastive learning strategy during training. Given a tuple of correctly and incorrectly executed exercises, our model is able to identify and highlight those joints that are involved in an incorrect movement and thus require the user's attention. We collected an in-house dataset, ExeCheck, with paired recordings of both correct and incorrect execution of exercises. In our experiments, we tested our method on this dataset as well as the UI-PRMD dataset and found ExeCheck outperformed the baseline method using pairwise sequence alignment in identifying joints of physical relevance in rehabilitation exercises.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions
A systematic review of Action Quality Assessment organizes the past decade of research into 7 trends, 9 dataset domains, and performance comparisons across 195 papers.