pith. sign in

Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that a growing amount of social media content is generated by autonomous entities known as social bots. In this work we present a framework to detect such entities on Twitter. We leverage more than a thousand features extracted from public data and meta-data about users: friends, tweet content and sentiment, network patterns, and activity time series. We benchmark the classification framework by using a publicly available dataset of Twitter bots. This training data is enriched by a manually annotated collection of active Twitter users that include both humans and bots of varying sophistication. Our models yield high accuracy and agreement with each other and can detect bots of different nature. Our estimates suggest that between 9% and 15% of active Twitter accounts are bots. Characterizing ties among accounts, we observe that simple bots tend to interact with bots that exhibit more human-like behaviors. Analysis of content flows reveals retweet and mention strategies adopted by bots to interact with different target groups. Using clustering analysis, we characterize several subclasses of accounts, including spammers, self promoters, and accounts that post content from connected applications.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CY 1

years

2023 1

verdicts

ACCEPT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks

cs.CY · 2023-06-21 · accept · novelty 3.0

The paper categorizes sources of catastrophic AI risks into malicious use, AI race, organizational risks, and rogue AIs, providing illustrative stories and mitigation suggestions for each.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks cs.CY · 2023-06-21 · accept · none · ref 21 · internal anchor

    The paper categorizes sources of catastrophic AI risks into malicious use, AI race, organizational risks, and rogue AIs, providing illustrative stories and mitigation suggestions for each.