Across 240 model configurations and 13 attacks, adaptive and curriculum adversarial training give the largest robustness gains, but 20.53% of evaluations show negative gains, mostly under mismatched source-target models and low-severity attacks.
Curriculum Adversarial Training
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recently, deep learning has been applied to many security-sensitive applications, such as facial authentication. The existence of adversarial examples hinders such applications. The state-of-the-art result on defense shows that adversarial training can be applied to train a robust model on MNIST against adversarial examples; but it fails to achieve a high empirical worst-case accuracy on a more complex task, such as CIFAR-10 and SVHN. In our work, we propose curriculum adversarial training (CAT) to resolve this issue. The basic idea is to develop a curriculum of adversarial examples generated by attacks with a wide range of strengths. With two techniques to mitigate the forgetting and the generalization issues, we demonstrate that CAT can improve the prior art's empirical worst-case accuracy by a large margin of 25% on CIFAR-10 and 35% on SVHN. At the same, the model's performance on non-adversarial inputs is comparable to the state-of-the-art models.
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
DUMB and DUMBer: Is Adversarial Training Worth It in the Real World?
Across 240 model configurations and 13 attacks, adaptive and curriculum adversarial training give the largest robustness gains, but 20.53% of evaluations show negative gains, mostly under mismatched source-target models and low-severity attacks.