Pith. sign in

Curriculum Adversarial Training

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Recently, deep learning has been applied to many security-sensitive applications, such as facial authentication. The existence of adversarial examples hinders such applications. The state-of-the-art result on defense shows that adversarial training can be applied to train a robust model on MNIST against adversarial examples; but it fails to achieve a high empirical worst-case accuracy on a more complex task, such as CIFAR-10 and SVHN. In our work, we propose curriculum adversarial training (CAT) to resolve this issue. The basic idea is to develop a curriculum of adversarial examples generated by attacks with a wide range of strengths. With two techniques to mitigate the forgetting and the generalization issues, we demonstrate that CAT can improve the prior art's empirical worst-case accuracy by a large margin of 25% on CIFAR-10 and 35% on SVHN. At the same, the model's performance on non-adversarial inputs is comparable to the state-of-the-art models.

fields

cs.CR 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

DUMB and DUMBer: Is Adversarial Training Worth It in the Real World?

cs.CR · 2025-06-23 · conditional · novelty 5.0

Across 240 model configurations and 13 attacks, adaptive and curriculum adversarial training give the largest robustness gains, but 20.53% of evaluations show negative gains, mostly under mismatched source-target models and low-severity attacks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • DUMB and DUMBer: Is Adversarial Training Worth It in the Real World? cs.CR · 2025-06-23 · conditional · none · ref 4 · internal anchor

    Across 240 model configurations and 13 attacks, adaptive and curriculum adversarial training give the largest robustness gains, but 20.53% of evaluations show negative gains, mostly under mismatched source-target models and low-severity attacks.