Large language models predict retinopathy of prematurity risk poorly from admission notes alone, over-predict medium and high risk, and positive emotional prompt framing partially corrects this bias.
Time Matters: Examine Temporal Effects on Biomedical Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Time roots in applying language models for biomedical applications: models are trained on historical data and will be deployed for new or future data, which may vary from training data. While increasing biomedical tasks have employed state-of-the-art language models, there are very few studies have examined temporal effects on biomedical models when data usually shifts across development and deployment. This study fills the gap by statistically probing relations between language model performance and data shifts across three biomedical tasks. We deploy diverse metrics to evaluate model performance, distance methods to measure data drifts, and statistical methods to quantify temporal effects on biomedical language models. Our study shows that time matters for deploying biomedical language models, while the degree of performance degradation varies by biomedical tasks and statistical quantification approaches. We believe this study can establish a solid benchmark to evaluate and assess temporal effects on deploying biomedical language models.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Affective-ROPTester: Capability and Bias Analysis of LLMs in Predicting Retinopathy of Prematurity
Large language models predict retinopathy of prematurity risk poorly from admission notes alone, over-predict medium and high risk, and positive emotional prompt framing partially corrects this bias.