Static attack trees are ontologically inadequate under the COVER risk ontology: their nodes and gates are semantically overloaded, key risk concepts are missing, modeling guidance is weak, and interoperability is limited.
ISO/IEC 31010:2019 - Risk management – Risk Assessment Techniques; 2019
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
An ontological lens on attack trees: Toward adequacy and interoperability
Static attack trees are ontologically inadequate under the COVER risk ontology: their nodes and gates are semantically overloaded, key risk concepts are missing, modeling guidance is weak, and interoperability is limited.