Critical Inker scaffolds critical reflection during AI-assisted writing via Socratic questioning and visual logical-error feedback, reporting 91.2% argument overlap with ground truth and 87% validity accuracy in a pilot evaluation.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.HC 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Survey and interview study finds neurodivergent computing students prefer structured collaborative active learning with small teams and explicit roles.
citing papers explorer
-
Critical Inker: Scaffolding Critical Thinking in AI-Assisted Writing Through Socratic Questioning
Critical Inker scaffolds critical reflection during AI-assisted writing via Socratic questioning and visual logical-error feedback, reporting 91.2% argument overlap with ground truth and 87% validity accuracy in a pilot evaluation.
-
"I can't read your mind": A Study of Neurodivergent Computing Students' Experiences with Collaborative Active Learning
Survey and interview study finds neurodivergent computing students prefer structured collaborative active learning with small teams and explicit roles.