DCMI infers RAG database membership by subtracting the system's yes-probability on a perturbed query from the original query, cancelling the interference of non-member retrieved documents.
AutoLAW: Augmented Legal Reasoning through Legal Precedent Prediction
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper demonstrate how NLP can be used to address an unmet need of the legal community and increase access to justice. The paper introduces Legal Precedent Prediction (LPP), the task of predicting relevant passages from precedential court decisions given the context of a legal argument. To this end, the paper showcases a BERT model, trained on 530,000 examples of legal arguments made by U.S. federal judges, to predict relevant passages from precedential court decisions given the context of a legal argument. In 96% of unseen test examples the correct target passage is among the top-10 predicted passages. The same model is able to predict relevant precedent given a short summary of a complex and unseen legal brief, predicting the precedent that was actually cited by the brief's co-author, former U.S. Solicitor General and current U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
DCMI: A Differential Calibration Membership Inference Attack Against Retrieval-Augmented Generation
DCMI infers RAG database membership by subtracting the system's yes-probability on a perturbed query from the original query, cancelling the interference of non-member retrieved documents.