Public defenders view AI as most useful for evidence investigation but limited in courtroom work and strategy, with adoption blocked by costs, confidentiality risks, and norms, requiring human oversight and open development.
When trust is zero sum: automation’s threat to epistemic agency.Ethics and Information Technology, 27(2):29, 2025
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
How Can AI Augment Access to Justice? Public Defenders' Perspectives on AI Adoption
Public defenders view AI as most useful for evidence investigation but limited in courtroom work and strategy, with adoption blocked by costs, confidentiality risks, and norms, requiring human oversight and open development.