The paper uses token-level recoverability as a computable lower bound on mutual information to compare LLMs and to fine-tune them, finding encoder-only models preserve information better than decoder-only models.
Leveraging Conditional Mutual Information to Improve Large Language Model Fine-Tuning For Classification
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in recent years, the potential of information theory (IT) to enhance LLM development remains underexplored. This paper introduces the information theoretic principle of Conditional Mutual Information (CMI) to LLM fine-tuning for classification tasks, exploring its promise in two main ways: minimizing CMI to improve a model's standalone performance and maximizing CMI to enhance knowledge distillation (KD) for more capable student models. To apply CMI in LLM fine-tuning, we adapt the recently proposed CMI-constrained deep learning framework, which was initially developed for image classification, with some modification. By minimizing CMI during LLM fine-tuning, we achieve superior performance gains on 6 of 8 GLUE classification tasks compared to BERT. Additionally, maximizing CMI during the KD process results in significant performance improvements in 6 of 8 GLUE classification tasks compared to DistilBERT. These findings demonstrate CMI's adaptability for optimizing both standalone LLMs and student models, showcasing its potential as a robust framework for advancing LLM fine-tuning. Our work bridges the gap between information theory and LLM development, offering new insights for building high-performing language models.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Rethinking the Understanding Ability across LLMs through Mutual Information
The paper uses token-level recoverability as a computable lower bound on mutual information to compare LLMs and to fine-tune them, finding encoder-only models preserve information better than decoder-only models.