Four LLMs show high agreement when scoring and ranking alternative uses and do not favor their own outputs, but the accuracy benchmark is derived from the generation prompts rather than human judgment.
A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be creative,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Do LLMs Agree on the Creativity Evaluation of Alternative Uses?
Four LLMs show high agreement when scoring and ranking alternative uses and do not favor their own outputs, but the accuracy benchmark is derived from the generation prompts rather than human judgment.