Pith. sign in

Homogeneous and isotropic cosmologies with nonlinear electromagnetic radiation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this paper I examine cosmological models that contain a stochastic background of nonlinear electromagnetic radiation. I show that for Born-Infeld electrodynamics the equation of state parameter, $w=P/\rho$, remains close to 1/3 throughout the evolution of the universe if $E^2=B^2$ in the late universe to a high degree of accuracy. Theories with electromagnetic Lagrangians of the form $L=-{1/4}F^2+\alpha F^4$ have recently been studied in magnetic universes, where the electric field vanishes. It was shown that the $F^4$ term can produce a bounce in the early universe, avoiding an initial singularity. Here I show that the inclusion of an electric field, with $E^2\simeq B^2$ in the late universe, eliminates the bounce and the universe "begins" in an initial singularity. I also examine theories with Lagrangians of the form $L=-{1/4}F^2-\mu^8/F^2$, which have been shown to produce a period of late time accelerated expansion in magnetic universes. I show that, if an electric field is introduced, the accelerated phase will only occur if $E^2<3B^2$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

hep-th 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Nonlinear Yang-Mills AdS black brane and DC conductivity

hep-th · 2024-12-01 · reject · novelty 5.0

For a holographic model with fractional non-abelian gauge fields, the DC conductivity is σ = (1 - 4 q1 h'(rh)^2)/(1 + 4 q1 h'(rh)^2)^3, which is below the usual lower bound for nonzero coupling.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Nonlinear Yang-Mills AdS black brane and DC conductivity hep-th · 2024-12-01 · reject · none · ref 7 · internal anchor

    For a holographic model with fractional non-abelian gauge fields, the DC conductivity is σ = (1 - 4 q1 h'(rh)^2)/(1 + 4 q1 h'(rh)^2)^3, which is below the usual lower bound for nonzero coupling.