Introduces the Matter to Mechanism benchmark of 2,645 structured instances and a composite metric suite for evaluating AI co-scientists on problem-to-hypothesis reasoning in battery materials research.
hub
SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientists
12 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
12
Pith papers citing it
hub tools
citation-role summary
dataset 2
background 1
citation-polarity summary
representative citing papers
SCICONVBENCH is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on multi-turn disambiguation and inconsistency resolution for task formulation in computational science, with frontier models reaching only 52.7% success on fluid mechanics disambiguation cases.
Collider-Bench is a new benchmark showing that current LLM agents cannot reliably reproduce LHC analyses at the level of a physicist-in-the-loop.
Proposes agentic framework-based reproduction with a slot-binding interface to turn 16 PHM papers into standardized, assumption-aware benchmark implementations.
Open-world evaluations using qualitative review of real-world tasks can give earlier warnings of frontier AI capabilities than automated benchmarks, as demonstrated by an AI agent publishing a simple iOS app with one minor human fix.
MOSAIC generates executable scientific code without I/O test cases by combining student-teacher distillation with a consolidated context window to reduce hallucinations across subproblems.
QMP-Bench supplies a realistic test set for AI on quantum many-body problems while PhysVEC uses integrated verifiers to turn unreliable LLM generations into code that passes both syntax and physics checks, outperforming baselines.
MOSAIC is a training-free multi-agent LLM framework with rationale, coding, reflection, and debugging agents plus a consolidated context window that outperforms prior methods on scientific coding benchmarks.
Entropy minimization on self-generated outputs elicits strong reasoning in pretrained LLMs, matching or exceeding supervised RL methods on benchmarks.
Adapts QuantumKatas to Qiskit yielding a 350-task benchmark across 26 categories and evaluates 16 LLMs in 39,200 runs, reporting performance gaps and prompting effects.
An empirical literature analysis reveals a bifurcation in RL environments into Semantic Prior (LLM-dominated) and Domain-Specific Generalization ecosystems with distinct cognitive fingerprints.
The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.