Treatment changes identify causal effects under two non-nested structural models that difference out time-constant confounders; under random walk on treatment these are equivalent to levels-based methods, and two-way fixed effects regression is doubly robust.
Causal Graphs for Conditional Parallel Trends
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Difference-in-Differences (DiD) is a widely used research design that often relies on a conditional parallel trends (CPT) assumption. In contrast to settings with unconfoundedness, where causal graphs provide powerful frameworks for reasoning about valid conditioning variables, general-purpose graphical tools for CPT are missing. We introduce transformed Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs), the $\Delta$-SWIGs, and prove that they enable us to read off conditional independencies via $d$-separation that imply CPT. Using $\Delta$-SWIGs, we study valid conditioning strategies for DiD in complex settings with multiple periods and time-varying covariates. We show that when time-varying covariates affect the outcome, controlling for post-treatment variables is required for identification. However, even when such controls are included, pre-treatment parallel trends are only informative about a subset of the assumptions required for unbiased post-treatment effects, highlighting the limitations of purely empirical justifications of CPT.
fields
econ.EM 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
When Do Treatment Changes Identify Causal Effects?
Treatment changes identify causal effects under two non-nested structural models that difference out time-constant confounders; under random walk on treatment these are equivalent to levels-based methods, and two-way fixed effects regression is doubly robust.