A graph-retrieval-augmented LLM pipeline for causal news classification reports 82.1% F1 with 20 examples, but likely leaks test data into its retrieval store.
The Causal News Corpus: Annotating Causal Relations in Event Sentences from News
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite the importance of understanding causality, corpora addressing causal relations are limited. There is a discrepancy between existing annotation guidelines of event causality and conventional causality corpora that focus more on linguistics. Many guidelines restrict themselves to include only explicit relations or clause-based arguments. Therefore, we propose an annotation schema for event causality that addresses these concerns. We annotated 3,559 event sentences from protest event news with labels on whether it contains causal relations or not. Our corpus is known as the Causal News Corpus (CNC). A neural network built upon a state-of-the-art pre-trained language model performed well with 81.20% F1 score on test set, and 83.46% in 5-folds cross-validation. CNC is transferable across two external corpora: CausalTimeBank (CTB) and Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB). Leveraging each of these external datasets for training, we achieved up to approximately 64% F1 on the CNC test set without additional fine-tuning. CNC also served as an effective training and pre-training dataset for the two external corpora. Lastly, we demonstrate the difficulty of our task to the layman in a crowd-sourced annotation exercise. Our annotated corpus is publicly available, providing a valuable resource for causal text mining researchers.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.IR 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
dataset 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
GraphRAG-Causal: A novel graph-augmented framework for causal reasoning and annotation in news
A graph-retrieval-augmented LLM pipeline for causal news classification reports 82.1% F1 with 20 examples, but likely leaks test data into its retrieval store.