Pluralis v0.1 is a culture-first, multimodal, multilingual VLM safety benchmark spanning 6 APAC locales with 6,448 prompts and an agreement-gated LLM judge that disentangles safety from cultural appropriateness.
Title resolution pending
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
5
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
Iterative self-rewarding via LLM-as-Judge in DPO training on Llama 2 70B improves instruction following and self-evaluation, outperforming GPT-4 on AlpacaEval 2.0.
The power distribution is the target of power sampling, the closed-form solution to self-reward KL-regularized RL, and the basis for power self-distillation that matches sampling performance at lower cost.
Different LLM jailbreak techniques achieve similar harmful compliance but lead to distinct behavioral side effects and mechanistic changes.
Finetuning open LMs on ChatGPT outputs creates models that mimic style and fool human raters but fail to close the performance gap to proprietary systems on tasks not well-represented in the imitation data.
citing papers explorer
-
Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability
Pluralis v0.1 is a culture-first, multimodal, multilingual VLM safety benchmark spanning 6 APAC locales with 6,448 prompts and an agreement-gated LLM judge that disentangles safety from cultural appropriateness.
-
Self-Rewarding Language Models
Iterative self-rewarding via LLM-as-Judge in DPO training on Llama 2 70B improves instruction following and self-evaluation, outperforming GPT-4 on AlpacaEval 2.0.
-
Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillation
The power distribution is the target of power sampling, the closed-form solution to self-reward KL-regularized RL, and the basis for power self-distillation that matches sampling performance at lower cost.
-
Different Paths to Harmful Compliance: Behavioral Side Effects and Mechanistic Divergence Across LLM Jailbreaks
Different LLM jailbreak techniques achieve similar harmful compliance but lead to distinct behavioral side effects and mechanistic changes.
-
The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs
Finetuning open LMs on ChatGPT outputs creates models that mimic style and fool human raters but fail to close the performance gap to proprietary systems on tasks not well-represented in the imitation data.