On a handwriting recognition task, fitting the model to one user's data via curriculum schedules or similar-sample augmentation slightly improves that user's accuracy but typically weakens general accuracy.
Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Explainable recommendation attempts to develop models that generate not only high-quality recommendations but also intuitive explanations. The explanations may either be post-hoc or directly come from an explainable model (also called interpretable or transparent model in some contexts). Explainable recommendation tries to address the problem of why: by providing explanations to users or system designers, it helps humans to understand why certain items are recommended by the algorithm, where the human can either be users or system designers. Explainable recommendation helps to improve the transparency, persuasiveness, effectiveness, trustworthiness, and satisfaction of recommendation systems. It also facilitates system designers for better system debugging. In recent years, a large number of explainable recommendation approaches -- especially model-based methods -- have been proposed and applied in real-world systems. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review for the explainable recommendation research. We first highlight the position of explainable recommendation in recommender system research by categorizing recommendation problems into the 5W, i.e., what, when, who, where, and why. We then conduct a comprehensive survey of explainable recommendation on three perspectives: 1) We provide a chronological research timeline of explainable recommendation. 2) We provide a two-dimensional taxonomy to classify existing explainable recommendation research. 3) We summarize how explainable recommendation applies to different recommendation tasks. We also devote a chapter to discuss the explanation perspectives in broader IR and AI/ML research. We end the survey by discussing potential future directions to promote the explainable recommendation research area and beyond.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Personalization of Deep Learning
On a handwriting recognition task, fitting the model to one user's data via curriculum schedules or similar-sample augmentation slightly improves that user's accuracy but typically weakens general accuracy.