Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09342 , year=
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Synthesizes literature into a four-stage lifecycle framework for cyberbullying governance from detection through proactive intervention.
citing papers explorer
-
Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good
Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.
-
Cyberbullying Governance on Social Media: A Unified Framework from Content Identification to Intervention
Synthesizes literature into a four-stage lifecycle framework for cyberbullying governance from detection through proactive intervention.