Training on all tokens (next token prediction) beats training only on answer tokens (critical token prediction) on small-scale reasoning benchmarks, an effect the authors attribute to noise-induced regularization.
A Law of Next-Token Prediction in Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely employed across various application domains, yet their black-box nature poses significant challenges to understanding how these models process input data internally to make predictions. In this paper, we introduce a precise and quantitative law that governs the learning of contextualized token embeddings through intermediate layers in pre-trained LLMs for next-token prediction. Our findings reveal that each layer contributes equally to enhancing prediction accuracy, from the lowest to the highest layer -- a universal phenomenon observed across a diverse array of open-source LLMs, irrespective of their architectures or pre-training data. We demonstrate that this law offers new perspectives and actionable insights to inform and guide practices in LLM development and applications, including model scaling, pre-training tasks, and interpretation.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Reasoning Bias of Next Token Prediction Training
Training on all tokens (next token prediction) beats training only on answer tokens (critical token prediction) on small-scale reasoning benchmarks, an effect the authors attribute to noise-induced regularization.