Pith. sign in

Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflection

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Leveraging more test-time computation has proven to be an effective way to boost the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Among various methods, the verify-and-improve paradigm stands out for enabling dynamic solution exploration and feedback incorporation. However, existing approaches often suffer from restricted feedback spaces and lack of coordinated training of different parties, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this, we model this multi-turn refinement process as a Markov Decision Process and introduce DPSDP (Direct Policy Search by Dynamic Programming), a reinforcement learning algorithm that trains an actor-critic LLM system to iteratively refine answers via direct preference learning on self-generated data. Theoretically, DPSDP can match the performance of any policy within the training distribution. Empirically, we instantiate DPSDP with various base models and show improvements on both in- and out-of-distribution benchmarks. For example, on benchmark MATH 500, majority voting over five refinement steps increases first-turn accuracy from 58.2% to 63.2% with Ministral-based models. An ablation study further confirms the benefits of multi-agent collaboration and out-of-distribution generalization.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-08-06 · conditional · novelty 5.0

Sampling multiple reasoning paths, refining each with self-critique and self-correction, then majority voting improves math reasoning accuracy over width-only or verifier-based test-time scaling on several open-weight LLMs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning cs.AI · 2026-08-06 · conditional · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    Sampling multiple reasoning paths, refining each with self-critique and self-correction, then majority voting improves math reasoning accuracy over width-only or verifier-based test-time scaling on several open-weight LLMs.