Pith. sign in

Better, Not Just More: Data-Centric Machine Learning for Earth Observation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Recent developments and research in modern machine learning have led to substantial improvements in the geospatial field. Although numerous deep learning architectures and models have been proposed, the majority of them have been solely developed on benchmark datasets that lack strong real-world relevance. Furthermore, the performance of many methods has already saturated on these datasets. We argue that a shift from a model-centric view to a complementary data-centric perspective is necessary for further improvements in accuracy, generalization ability, and real impact on end-user applications. Furthermore, considering the entire machine learning cycle-from problem definition to model deployment with feedback-is crucial for enhancing machine learning models that can be reliable in unforeseen situations. This work presents a definition as well as a precise categorization and overview of automated data-centric learning approaches for geospatial data. It highlights the complementary role of data-centric learning with respect to model-centric in the larger machine learning deployment cycle. We review papers across the entire geospatial field and categorize them into different groups. A set of representative experiments shows concrete implementation examples. These examples provide concrete steps to act on geospatial data with data-centric machine learning approaches.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Multi-Agent Geospatial Copilots for Remote Sensing Workflows

cs.LG · 2025-01-27 · conditional · novelty 5.0

A hybrid multi-agent orchestrator (composition plus iterative reassessment) reports 60.3% agentic correctness on generated remote sensing workflows, about 17 percentage points above the single-agent GeoLLM-Engine baseline.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Multi-Agent Geospatial Copilots for Remote Sensing Workflows cs.LG · 2025-01-27 · conditional · none · ref 59 · internal anchor

    A hybrid multi-agent orchestrator (composition plus iterative reassessment) reports 60.3% agentic correctness on generated remote sensing workflows, about 17 percentage points above the single-agent GeoLLM-Engine baseline.