Chess platform data shows self-selection by skilled users into AI feedback masks true effects, widens skill gaps, and causally reduces intellectual diversity via 42 natural experiments.
Thus, our study supports the body of work suggesting that AI acts as a complement to high skill (Acemoglu and Autor, 2011; Autor, 2024; Autor et al
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
econ.GN 1years
2024 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Who Benefits from AI? Self-Selection, Skill Gap, and the Hidden Costs of AI Feedback
Chess platform data shows self-selection by skilled users into AI feedback masks true effects, widens skill gaps, and causally reduces intellectual diversity via 42 natural experiments.